Health Risk and Scam
3D movies have become a craze over the last few years, with Avatar leading the success in 3D. You will find many other movies following in pursuit of this new found craze.
However, just how much do we know about 3D and does it have any serious long term health risks, or is it simply a money making scam, if not both, or will it fade into the dust and be just another faze?
Before I begin with any claims, let me tell you about myself...
I used to work for Ster-Kinekor, back in the early 90's, when we first saw stereo change to Dolby Pro-logic then into Dolby Digital, DTS and SDDS. (Sony Dynamic Digital Sound)
During this time all movies cost as little as R15 for all shows and R25 for the 8pm
This was the busiest time for shows. I remember the times when there were no movies on a Sunday, then soon it came about that Sundays would also be added to the entertainment list.
Now as technology improved, and instillations shot through the roof, So did the prices at the cinemas, in turn seeing less people attending the movies, thus the cinema's had to think of new ways to draw crowds.
Home Theatres started becoming a norm around about this time so it now saw us purchasing movies to rent and watch it on our own big screens...
The early days it was about sound, DTS made sure of it, in 1998 to 2005 home theatre equipment was being sold everywhere, from mini home theatre systems to proper component home theatres that supported up to 7 channels for Dolby Digital and DTS.
Seeing the increase of home theatre saw the decrease of attendance at cinemas.
Behold, the year, 2009. 2009 sees a whole new era of movies. 3D cinema fast becomes a craze beginning with Avatar. However Avatar was never the first attempt at 3D
What do we know about 3D? so far, very little!
- Like what are the effects of prolonged exposure?
- How easy is it to insert subliminal messages?
- Could anyone be brainwashed during these screenings?
- What are the short term health risks?
- What are the long term health risks?
Now televisions are being transformed into 3D, just what are the dangers here, front reflecting light versus light in the cinema projected from behind. Wouldn't the dangers be worse?
Before 3D movies 2D was about the size of the screen. The bigger the better, today it's about how you see it... I say a good storyline makes a good movie not 3D.
Now to get to the first part of my point...
- Normal 2D movies have shot up since my working days in the cinema
- 3D, the prices are almost double that of a normal movie,
- There is almost no signs posted around the cinemas of the risks when going to see a movie in 3D.
Should that not be considered good business practice, as even though it's a minority, the majority should know this as well. I as an epileptic never knew of the dangers until early 2 months back...
So why are the public not being made aware of this?
- Are the public being conned into paying more for a movie when they can make the choice between 2D or 3D
- Shouldn't they be screening both movies regardless of which version is more popular..
- Would you go see a movie in 3D if you knew of the possible risks to your health.
Is Ster-Kinekor and Numetro Playing dumb, or they to ignorant of the facts?
In which case I give you some links below I thing you should read first for yourself and make your own conclusions.
First lets mention some symptoms you may all get, bare in mind this is mostly a minority and not the majority of people,
- Fatigue,
- Headaches,
- Migraines,
- Dizziness,
- Nausea,
- blackouts and in some cases
- epileptic seizures.
Half an hour after seeing the film Alice In Wonderland in 3D, Josh James blacked out on his way home and rolled his car. Could 3D have been to blame? View Josh's 3D story here! "How Watching Films Can be Bad for the Brain"
Proponents of the current '3D revolution' are wrong – the technology was a shortlived novelty in the 1950s, and so it will prove again...
I quote from an excerpt out of this article
"In the real world, a person's eyes converge when they look at nearby objects and diverge when they look into the distance. At the same time, a person's eyes have to focus.
---- 3D violates the normal rules of perception."
"You're taking that normal relationship which has been coupled in the brain for years and you're changing it; we showed that can cause fatigue,"
A few weeks ago Samsung posted a warning on their Australian website, saying that, “Some viewers may experience discomfort while viewing 3D TV such as dizziness, nausea and headaches.
However I find this above statement odd since this warning has since been removed.
Just what are the wholesalers and retailers up to?
Are they suddenly trying to sell all their stock to avoid future scandles on heath risks related to their products?
Is there now less talk about 3D tv's?
I again quote from the site above...
"As we get swept away by the wonders of watching mind blowing 3D imagery in cinemas and now at home, it is worth asking the question about the nature of problems that it may bring along with it. On a personal basis I find the idea of 3D to be quite discomforting as there is no telling what effect it might have on the human brain itself when it is exposed in a state of self inflicted “ecstasy” of imagery"
I quote again
"He said in a 3D movie, these people (people with eye problems) are confronted with an entirely new sensory experience"
"That translates into greater mental effort, making it easier to get a headache," Rosenberg said in a telephone interview.
So, the above remains more investigation is needed, but in the end, the facts are, some people are left with headaches, the short term effects and cinemas should be warning their patrons of the risks as this will result in a better experience for movie goers in the end, so they can be informed and make the right choices leaving both parties in the clear.
No one is 100% clear on any or all dangers relating to long term exposure, the technology is still very new albeit being used since the 50's and only improved since 2009. We are still in the dark as to how far these effects can go.
No one is 100% clear on any or all dangers relating to long term exposure, the technology is still very new albeit being used since the 50's and only improved since 2009. We are still in the dark as to how far these effects can go.